Just because it fits, Neil Gaiman is also being warned - for a link from one website to another website. Which in itself is nonsense - after all, the entire web consists of links (and no, the target website is nothing forbidden). The particularly absurd thing: he is not the one who placed the link. He only appears in a report on the website with a picture, that's all. With a tomato. And somewhere else there is a link to the website for the cult trash "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes". And the latter rights holders are probably the cause of the warning ...
The quality of research in the context of warnings seems to be suffering outside of Germany as well.
... when Ajax, JavaScript, Web 2.0 even make it into the Tagesschau newsfeed. Well, the Schieb, of course - the revival of Wolf-Gang, only thinner and no duet. And with less destructive tendencies towards technical equipment.
No idea what other services Euroweb Internet GmbH uses to make money, but publicity stunts should not be one of them, as they are currently reaching new lows with their approach to dealing with unfavorable criticism. Somehow, I don't understand such companies and their lawyers. On the one hand, it is constantly being said that the internet is not a lawless space - but through the massive approach and the potentially high costs, such actions make the internet de facto exactly that lawless space. And from the political side, there are at best drafts to escalate the whole situation, instead of providing useful tools against obvious excesses such as mass cease and desist letters. Or even considering to what extent the means of cease and desist against privately operated websites make sense at all, or whether the means of cease and desist should not be focused much more strongly.
... sues Google Kinderstart - because they are not ranked number 1 on Google, unlike other search engines, when searching for the term "Kinderstart". Is this somehow a permanent full moon?