110 far-right incidents in the Bundeswehr in ten months
Just a lot of isolated cases. Nothing to see here. Move along.
At RP-Online: Politik I found the original article.
Just a lot of isolated cases. Nothing to see here. Move along.
At RP-Online: Politik I found the original article.
A feuilleton by Michael Moore in Die Zeit. Available in full online. He also has a few quips for us: "It's as if you're turning into us, into a people that believes the rich must always get richer and everyone else should kiss their ass." Here's the original article.
Sure, it's not a big deal to put up an imprint – but what's all this cease-and-desist nonsense? If laws are now only being misused to enforce wrongdoing, then it's high time we changed the laws.
The fact that a central authority against unfair competition lends itself to such rubbish says a lot. What kind of legal understanding does it take to abuse an apparatus designed to protect economic interests to beat up on a private website? And how do they reconcile that with their own mandate: as a cross-industry association of companies and business organizations for the purpose of promoting commercial interests within the meaning of § 13 UWG throughout the federal territory? What kind of promotion of commercial interests is present in such an absurd attack? Sure, now all sorts of people will cry out: but it would be commercial for these-and-those-absurd-reasons – maybe because of banner advertising or whatever else – and then they'll immediately tell you again that the law is simply unambiguous on this and that the competition authority is in the right. So what? Screw being right! In Germany it's only about being right anymore, no matter how absurd, how ridiculous, or how stupid the occasion is. Stop to think about whether the action is even appropriate? Oh come on. Why would you, that would overload the poor little brain...
In a few billion years, Canis Major should be completely dissolved. - that should drastically lower property prices there

At Physikalische Kleinigkeiten there is the original article.
Merkel said on Wednesday evening on ZDF that the CDU leadership had left no doubt with its rebuke of Hohmann that ways of thinking like those of the MP would not be tolerated. - which is why he continues to be a faction member and remains a party member. Because of course a way of thinking changes immediately through a rebuke.
We acted decisively and announced consequences for any repetition. - well, surely that will prompt Hohmann to change his mind. He's now a very nice and friendly fellow. Sure. We all believe that.
The Union leadership has done nothing in all previous incidents involving Hohmann, and it will in fact do nothing here either. And not the next time either. No wonder - at a time when a Minister President writes a foreword to a book that propagates far-right ideological ideas, such an MP hardly stands out.
However, it irritates me that Jürgen Rüttgers actually makes a demand that I agree with - namely the one for Hohmann's expulsion. A topsy-turvy world.
I found the original article on RP-Online: Politik.
Well, of course that can be done. And I even believe in the easily - because the complete hardware abstraction is in the Darwin kernel. The system is nicely layered - everything higher up is written in Objective-C (okay, older parts from the old OS world like Appleworks certainly in C++ or C). The porting effort for OS X to Intel should really be very minimal. And I even think that within Apple there could well be a machine with Intel chips running ported OS X. The question is whether Apple would benefit from it: Apple doesn't just make money from supplying software (or an operating system among many), but also and especially from sold hardware. If Apple now switches not only the used components but also the CPU to standard parts, what kind of control or defense would Apple still have against the clones so despised by His Highness?
Because one thing is clear: an open clone market would be anything but beneficial for Apple. They need their own hardware market - and the availability of cheap alternative devices would disturb that very significantly.
At MacGuardians you can find the original article.
And so they come to light, one after another: the lies of the US government.
On RP-Online: Politik I found the original article.