8.0 already
Oh no, not another new version. Well, I can potentially ignore this one just like everything between 5.0 and 7.0
At photojunkie you can find the original article.
Archive 7. February 2003
Well-informed circles
Yeah, I just heard that on the radio too (WDR 3). Ouch. Great intelligence service that plagiarizes.
At Industrial Technology & Witchcraft you can find the original article.
Letters to the Editor
Yep, that's a problem with Microsoft systems, patches often don't work, conflict with each other or are just not there (or you don't know about because nobody tells you). That's why I prefer systems where the systems developers / maintainers give you a useable security feed. Like most Linux or BSD systems with working distributed software repositories. I don't quite understand why Microsoft doesn't do the obvious and set up a mechanism like the Debian apt-get stuff in their current OS and distribute working patches this way. But maybe it is too obvious ... Bei New York Times: Technology fand ich den den Originalartikel.
Finally a truly pointless feature of the Community Server
It's new. It's colorful. It's chaotic. And simply cool.
New Revelations on Doctor Fraud with the Dead
Hmm. Together with the protest of medical representatives against the planned central office for quality control in medicine, certain suspicions come to mind.
At tagesschau im Internet there's the original article.
You have mail
Hmm. Parliamentarian blocked by its own protection filter. Hmm. Would that be a sustainable concept? I mean, what if it were arranged so that all content of interest to Büssow were moved to servers listed in his silly blocking order?
At Der Schockwellenreiter there's the original article.
Weblog Software at Others
Hihi, I'm glad I caught the calendar thing early enough, I'm just a lazy dog
By the way, the esteemed colleagues could also simply consider switching to the Python Desktop Server, for which I even have a – very rudimentary, but certainly could be expanded – migration script from Radio. After all, I had to do it myself.
I'll solve the ping issue by simply ignoring it. It doesn't matter which of the last 5 articles I show up as a change for on weblogs.com, it pings based on the weblog rather than individual articles. And the weblog really doesn't need to appear 10 times in 5 minutes just because someone can type and read quickly.
At Der Schockwellenreiter you can find the original article.